|
Link color codes:
Britannica Wikipedia Project Gutenberg Questia The Teaching Company FindArticles News: The Economist Depesjer Sploid Music chart:
Worth reading
$_GET['zfposition']="p49"; $_GET['zftemplate']="bsblog2";$_GET['zf_link']="off";
include('../newsfeeds/zfeeder.php'); ?>
From the archives: include("best_of.inc") ?> Remember, remember 11 September; Murderous monsters in flight; Reject their dark game; And let Liberty's flame; Burn prouder and ever more bright - Geoffrey Barto "Bjørn Stærks hyklerske dobbeltmoral er til å spy av. Under det syltynne fernisset av redelighet sitter han klar med en vulkan av diagnoser han kan klistre på annerledes tenkende mennesker når han etter beste evne har spilt sine kort. Jeg tror han har forregnet seg. Det blir ikke noe hyggelig under sharia selv om han har slikket de nye herskernes støvlesnuter."
2005: 12 | 11 | 10 | 09 | 08 | 07 | 06 | 05 | 04 | 03 | 02 | 01
|
Low ego zone
In today's VG, embedded reporters Kim Riseth and Harald Henden praises the American battalion they're with for its attitude towards the media: There's an amazing openness. Every soldier says whatever they like about what they think and feel. We sit in meetings with the leadership of the battalion, and receive the same information as they do, at the same time. I can't imagine a Norwegian company which would be as open to media attempting to do a report about their business. And this is a relatively controversial business, where mistakes are quite serious. [..] Among other things, they told us about an oil pipeline that had been destroyed by accident. Riseth and Henden's seems to be about the only original Norwegian reporting from Iraq that's any good at the moment. They stick to telling just plain interesting stories as seen from the ground, without that compulsive need to put everything in perspective. Perspective is fine, but worthless unless you have something to, you know, put in perspective. One can watch some of these 24/7 channels for hours without learning the details of any actual news. So heads up for some old-fashioned low-ego reporting from the inside of a military force at war.
Suman Palit | 2003-03-30 21:57 |
Link
Butbutbbuttt, I thought the embeds were just brainwashed (and unwashed) tools of the American military-industrial-media hegemony in collusion with a bunch of sauna-loving, norwegian oil-men who were once in bed with Bush Senior.. silly me :-) Sandy P. | 2003-03-31 04:59 | Link Poor guys, I wonder what the deprogramming will entail when they return? George Butcher | 2003-03-31 16:40 | Link
ct, no cal | 2003-03-31 18:25 | Link George Butcher: Because there are currently voices on the left that are beyond charicature regarding their stupidity and ignorance regarding the war it makes it difficult to assume that a post such as yours is obviously ironic or not. The U.S. will not take over Norway. For one thing Norway's oil reserves are close to running out. Markku Nordstrom, New York/Helsinki | 2003-03-31 20:39 | Link The Pentagon certainly made the right move in embedding reporters with the troops. So far, the benefits have far outweighed the downside. It's hard to argue with facts coming straight from the frontlines... Ghost of Captain Rationale | 2003-04-03 08:43 | Link According to a story covered by a veteran BBC reporter in the weeks previous to the war, the Pentagon had threatened reporters' lives and told them exactly what it was that they could and could not cover. Markku Nordstrom, New York/Helsinki | 2003-04-03 13:49 | Link Ghost: That's a good example of how far the BBC goes to distort the truth. No wonder they call it the Baghdad Broadcasting Corp here in the US. While in Finland last year, I got attuned to the message the BBC broadcast to the world. I was amazed how my fellow Finns bought their point of view completely. I tried to point out exactly where the spin to stories was applied - where exactly a certain word choice was made which gave a story a slant instead of being left neutral. But the BBC has a lot of cachet in Finland, and Europe. Though Finns could agree that there was a slant, it was the BBC, after all, that was saying it, and they therefore have a certain amount of authority... My strategy then was to compare the BBC to Finland's STT News show. I pointed out that the STT sticks to facts very well (I'm actually quite impressed by that; STT might be the most factual news service I've ever seen). The Finns appreciated my appreciation: STT appeals to the stoic, factual nature of the Finns. But STT is incredibly staid and dull, without the pizzazz of BBC and other foreign news services. So naturally STT will lose some to the more flashy BBC interpretations of the world. payday advance | 2004-11-26 07:50 | Link Thanks for that insightful comment! It makes interesting reading, especially when I need a payday advance . Trackback
Trackback URL: http://bearstrong.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/138
PapaScott: Children's Stories, March 30, 2003 09:06 PM I've been refraining commenting on the war since it started, since I'm assuming that 90% of what the media is reporting is wrong and I don't know which 10% is... Post a comment
Comments on posts from the old Movable Type blog has been disabled. |